Warning: file_exists(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/srv/http/vhosts/aur.archlinux.org/public/web/locale//en/LC_MESSAGES/aurweb.mo) is not within the allowed path(s): (/srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/:/etc/aurweb/) in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/streams.php on line 90
AUR (en) - vimperator-git

Notice: Undefined variable: name in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc.php on line 248

Package Details: vimperator-git r5195-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/vimperator-git.git (read-only)
Package Base: vimperator-git
Description: Make Firefox look and behave like Vim
Upstream URL: https://github.com/vimperator/vimperator-labs
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: vimperator
Provides: vimperator
Submitter: nfnty
Maintainer: nfnty
Last Packager: nfnty
Votes: 7
Popularity: 1.040364
First Submitted: 2014-10-20 21:36
Last Updated: 2017-01-30 21:15

Pinned Comments

nfnty commented on 2015-05-12 12:24

Issues and pull requests at https://github.com/nfnty/pkgbuilds

Latest Comments

hhu94 commented on 2016-02-21 06:39

Nice package, thank you :)

blueyed commented on 2016-01-28 00:15

`xpinstall.signatures.required=false` worked for me (an Arch settings maybe?!).

Apart from that it also mentions:

> You can also use the jpm sign command to generate a signed XPI that can be self-hosted.

nfnty commented on 2016-01-27 17:38

@blueyed: Unfortunately not. You're building the extension locally and therefore will need to override addon signing for this package to work again. If you read the page you linked and [1] you will understand why.

[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Addons/Extension_Signing

blueyed commented on 2016-01-27 12:01

Can this addon be signed, please?
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-on-signing-in-firefox?as=u&utm_source=inproduct

nfnty commented on 2015-05-13 15:46

Your problem may be fixed. I updated the pkgver to match the way libalpm compares versions.

nfnty commented on 2015-05-13 14:30

What exactly do you mean by "tries to update"? Post pacman output.

Knight commented on 2015-05-13 11:51

@nfnty
I don't know whether it only happens on my machine, but it is weird that pacman trys to update this package again and again, even after I remove the package and reinstall it.

nfnty commented on 2015-05-12 12:24

Issues and pull requests at https://github.com/nfnty/pkgbuilds