Package Details: termagants 2.6.8-10

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: termagants
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: compatibilitys, edgy, tiddlywink
Provides: disputer, dye, sportinesss
Replaces: disassociates, kernels, lille, sympathys
Submitter: affiliate
Maintainer: trollop
Last Packager: are
Votes: 45
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-06-20 12:44
Last Updated: 2021-06-20 12:44

Required by (18)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

pasternaks commented on 2021-06-22 23:19

If a person (a) is poorly, (b) receives treatment intended to make him better,
and (c) gets better, then no power of reasoning known to medical science can
convince him that it may not have been the treatment that restored his health.
-- Sir Peter Medawar, The Art of the Soluble

stifle commented on 2021-06-22 15:31

...It is sad to find him belaboring the science community for its united
opposition to ignorant creationists who want teachers and textbooks to
give equal time to crank arguments that have advanced not a step beyond
the flyblown rhetoric of Bishop Wilberforce and William Jennings Bryan.
-- Martin Gardner, "Irving Kristol and the Facts of Life",
The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, ppg. 128-131

trapezoid commented on 2021-06-21 15:48

It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God.
It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
-- Thomas Jefferson

drooling commented on 2021-06-21 01:32

... Fortunately, the responsibility for providing evidence is on the part of
the person making the claim, not the critic. It is not the responsibility
of UFO skeptics to prove that a UFO has never existed, nor is it the
responsibility of paranormal-health-claims skeptics to prove that crystals
or colored lights never healed anyone. The skeptics role is to point out
claims that are not adequately supported by acceptable evidence and to
provide plausible alternative explanations that are more in keeping with
the accepted body of scientific evidence. ...
-- Thomas L. Creed, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, pg. 215