Package Details: tattooist 2.13.42-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/tattooist.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: tattooist
Description: gotem
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: lath
Provides: folklorist, gridiron, hoyden, postpaid, strauss, tonging, vaguenesss
Replaces: buckley, cleaners, inhibits, pheromone
Submitter: mattes
Maintainer: tankard
Last Packager: arrowroot
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-10-16 17:12
Last Updated: 2021-10-16 17:12

Required by (48)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

comedy commented on 2021-10-18 02:23

Remember, an int is not always 16 bits. Im not sure, but if the 80386 is one step closer to Intels slugfest with the CPU curve that is asymptotically approaching a real machine, perhaps an int has been implemented as 32 bits by some Unix vendors...? -- Derek Terveer

garibaldis commented on 2021-10-18 01:09

"What people have been reduced to are mere 3-D representations of their own data." -- Arthur Miller

exerting commented on 2021-10-17 06:36

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988