Warning: file_exists(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/srv/http/vhosts/aur.archlinux.org/public/web/locale//en/LC_MESSAGES/aurweb.mo) is not within the allowed path(s): (/srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/:/etc/aurweb/) in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/streams.php on line 90
AUR (en) - sync-my-l2p

Notice: Undefined variable: name in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc.php on line 248

Package Details: sync-my-l2p 2.2.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/sync-my-l2p.git (read-only)
Package Base: sync-my-l2p
Description: Sync the L2P of the RWTH Aachen with your Computer
Upstream URL: http://www.sync-my-l2p.de/
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: clonejo
Maintainer: badboy
Last Packager: badboy
Votes: 6
Popularity: 0.112080
First Submitted: 2015-04-15 11:30
Last Updated: 2016-01-16 00:16

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

birnenwerfer commented on 2016-01-14 22:08

A new Update is available.


badboy commented on 2015-07-29 20:57

Gnaaah, I thought I tested it just fine. Seems I missed that, not sure why. Fixed in a couple of minutes.

jei commented on 2015-07-29 20:49

It now downloads fine, but deb2targz tries to extract vivid instead of vivid1?

badboy commented on 2015-07-08 18:50

Update/fix the tool you're using or install this manually. I won't update legacy-aur at this point, sorry.

birnenwerfer commented on 2015-07-08 18:31

In aur.archlinux.org the Link to the source is still "vivid" instaead of "vivid1".
When I try to install sync-my-l2p, then he tries to install the packet from aur.archlinux.org
I know that aur4 will be the new aur, but at the moment I cant install the programm due to the false link

badboy commented on 2015-07-08 18:21

pacman refers to what?
aur.archlinux.org is updated, I will only update aur4.archlinux.org (which by August will be the new aur.archlinux.org)

birnenwerfer commented on 2015-07-08 18:16

Sorry for disturbing you again. I see that pacman refers to this packet and there is the same problem.
Thanks in advance.

badboy commented on 2015-07-08 16:37

From my opened ticket:

> The release files were declared as v2.1.1, but the files were compiled from
v2.1.0 source files. After noticing this issue, the correct files were

badboy commented on 2015-07-08 16:24

Yey for people replacing files _after_ a release.

birnenwerfer commented on 2015-07-08 16:11

Hello, unfortunately the Source Link is wrong.
Could you please correct it?
The failure is in the word "vivid", which has to be replaced by "vivid1"

Could you please fix it?