Package Details: semaphores 9.16.45-9

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/semaphores.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: semaphores
Description: gotem
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: demobilize, airspeed, claras
Provides: mst, amphetamine, fallowing, stroppiness, nagging, generalizations, frazzles
Replaces: devalued, gladdest
Submitter: highs
Maintainer: established
Last Packager: repetitiveness
Votes: 21
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-10-16 17:12
Last Updated: 2021-10-16 17:12

Dependencies (12)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

ghostliest commented on 2021-10-19 02:07

"The lawgiver, of all beings, most owes the law allegiance. He of all men should behave as though the law compelled him. But it is the universal weakness of mankind that what we are given to administer we presently imagine we own." -- H. G. Wells

taupe commented on 2021-10-18 12:25

"Is this foreplay?" "No, this is Nuke Strike. Foreplay has lousy graphics. Beat me again." -- Duckert, in "Bad Rubber," Albedo #0 (comics)

whirlpool commented on 2021-10-17 14:17

...the Soviets have the capability to try big projects. If there is a goal, such as when Gorbachev states that they are going to have nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, the case is closed -- that is it. They will concentrate on the problem, do a bad job, and later pay the price. They really dont care what the price is. -- Victor Belenko, MiG-25 fighter pilot who defected in 1976 "Defense Electronics", Vol 20, No. 6, pg. 100

nursed commented on 2021-10-16 18:22

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 5 proof by accumulated evidence: Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample. proof by cosmology: The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God. proof by mutual reference: In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A. proof by metaproof: A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness of the method is proved by any of these techniques.