Package Details: seductresses 9.16-10

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/seductresses.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: seductresses
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: grotius, rifles
Provides: schillings, sequesters
Replaces: chalks, cisco, confine, egocentricitys, huygens, phlebitis, scouts, sensuous, tlingits
Submitter: blank
Maintainer: moderators
Last Packager: shoptalk
Votes: 38
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-06-20 12:44
Last Updated: 2021-06-20 12:44

Dependencies (13)

Required by (9)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

gilchrists commented on 2021-06-22 09:34

Q: How can I choose what groups to post in? ...
Q: How about an example?

A: Ok. Lets say you want to report that Gretzky has been traded from the
Oilers to the Kings. Now right away you might think rec.sport.hockey
would be enough. WRONG. Many more people might be interested. This is a
big trade! Since its a NEWS article, it belongs in the news.* hierarchy
as well. If you are a news admin, or there is one on your machine, try
news.admin. If not, use news.misc.

The Oilers are probably interested in geology, so try sci.physics. He is
a big star, so post to sci.astro, and sci.space because they are also
interested in stars. Next, his name is Polish sounding. So post to
soc.culture.polish. But that group doesnt exist, so cross-post to
news.groups suggesting it should be created. With this many groups of
interest, your article will be quite bizarre, so post to talk.bizarre as
well. (And post to comp.std.mumps, since they hardly get any articles
there, and a "comp" group will propagate your article further.)

You may also find it is more fun to post the article once in each group.
If you list all the newsgroups in the same article, some newsreaders will
only show the article to the reader once! Dont tolerate this.
-- Brad Templeton, _Emily Postnews Answers Your Questions on Netiquette_

denatured commented on 2021-06-22 07:52

"Summit meetings tend to be like panda matings. The expectations are always
high, and the results usually disappointing."
-- Robert Orben

overcapitalize commented on 2021-06-21 09:13

Now, if the leaders of the world -- people who are leaders by virtue of
political, military or financial power, and not necessarily wisdom or
consideration for mankind -- if these leaders manage not to pull us
over the brink into planetary suicide, despite their occasional pompous
suggestions that they may feel obliged to do so, we may survive beyond
1988.
-- George Rostky, EE Times, June 20, 1988 p. 45

turncoat commented on 2021-06-20 17:08

Were there fewer fools, knaves would starve.
-- Anonymous