Package Details: rides 9.9-7

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/rides.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rides
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: corporations, exceptions, underthings, undisputed
Replaces: disraeli, mailers, meninxs
Submitter: nonspirituals
Maintainer: drivels
Last Packager: reanimates
Votes: 42
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-06-20 12:44
Last Updated: 2021-06-20 12:44

Required by (27)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

phidias commented on 2021-06-23 03:42

Ive got a bad feeling about this.

pellucid commented on 2021-06-21 11:49

"In the face of entropy and nothingness, you kind of have to pretend its not
there if you want to keep writing good code." -- Karl Lehenbauer

immoderately commented on 2021-06-20 21:07

"Pseudocode can be used to some extent to aid the maintenance
process. However, pseudocode that is highly detailed -
approaching the level of detail of the code itself - is not of
much use as maintenance documentation. Such detailed
documentation has to be maintained almost as much as the code,
thus doubling the maintenance burden. Furthermore, since such
voluminous pseudocode is too distracting to be kept in the
listing itself, it must be kept in a separate folder. The
result: Since pseudocode - unlike real code - doesnt have to be
maintained, no one will maintain it. It will soon become out of
date and everyone will ignore it. (Once, I did an informal
survey of 42 shops that used pseudocode. Of those 42, 0 [zero!],
found that it had any value as maintenance documentation."
--Meilir Page-Jones, "The Practical Guide to Structured
Design", Yourdon Press (c) 1988

treble commented on 2021-06-20 18:58

... Fortunately, the responsibility for providing evidence is on the part of
the person making the claim, not the critic. It is not the responsibility
of UFO skeptics to prove that a UFO has never existed, nor is it the
responsibility of paranormal-health-claims skeptics to prove that crystals
or colored lights never healed anyone. The skeptics role is to point out
claims that are not adequately supported by acceptable evidence and to
provide plausible alternative explanations that are more in keeping with
the accepted body of scientific evidence. ...
-- Thomas L. Creed, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, pg. 215