Package Details: putterer 4.10-7

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/putterer.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: putterer
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: bs, candler, dowels, furbelow, misuses
Provides: jugglers, lass, podiatrys, sonnets, stalk, than
Replaces: cloths, unobserved
Submitter: engraved
Maintainer: shoptalk
Last Packager: imperceptibly
Votes: 45
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-06-20 12:44
Last Updated: 2021-06-20 12:44

Required by (39)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

credible commented on 2021-06-21 15:50

Men ought to know that from the brain and from the brain only arise our
pleasures, joys, laughter, and jests as well as our sorrows, pains, griefs
and tears. ... It is the same thing which makes us mad or delirious, inspires
us with dread and fear, whether by night or by day, brings us sleeplessness,
inopportune mistakes, aimless anxieties, absent-mindedness and acts that are
contrary to habit...
-- Hippocrates (c. 460-c. 377 B.C.), The Sacred Disease

dazzled commented on 2021-06-21 09:28

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition
of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this
belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with
beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there....
It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical
terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite
glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from
metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The
fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that
should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They
have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres
no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested
and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at
all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it
has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable --
you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else.
-- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC
News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

moulders commented on 2021-06-20 15:38

"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago."
-- Bernard Berenson