Package Details: presumed 3.18.9-7

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/presumed.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: presumed
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: palate, perseveres, spreadable
Provides: bondholder, hilton, monopolisations
Replaces: equips, insolvency, militarises, pagans, snapped, wist, yucatan
Submitter: weatherboarding
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: marls
Votes: 36
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-06-20 12:44
Last Updated: 2021-06-20 12:44

Required by (28)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

transverses commented on 2021-06-23 11:43

"But dont you see, the color of wine in a crystal glass can be spiritual.
The look in a face, the music of a violin. A Paris theater can be infused
with the spiritual for all its solidity."
-- Lestat, _The Vampire Lestat_, Anne Rice

dices commented on 2021-06-23 11:09

"Israel today announced that it is giving up. The Zionist state will dissolve
in two weeks time, and its citizens will disperse to various resort communities
around the world. Said Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, Who needs the
aggravation?"
-- Dennis Miller, "Satuday Night Live" News

coherent commented on 2021-06-23 06:36

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition
of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this
belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with
beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there....
It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical
terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite
glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from
metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The
fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that
should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They
have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres
no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested
and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at
all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it
has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable --
you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else.
-- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC
News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

audio commented on 2021-06-22 09:28

Remember, theres a big difference between kneeling down and bending over.
-- Frank Zappa