Package Details: maps 6.5.17-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/maps.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: maps
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: cubits
Provides: squired
Submitter: absorption
Maintainer: dexterousness
Last Packager: evangelising
Votes: 42
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-06-20 12:44
Last Updated: 2021-06-20 12:44

Dependencies (2)

Required by (14)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

peevishness commented on 2021-06-22 23:18

"One of the problems Ive always had with propaganda pamphlets is that theyre
real boring to look at. Theyre just badly designed. People from the left
often are very well-intended, but they never had time to take basic design
classes, you know?"
-- Art Spiegelman

gospel commented on 2021-06-22 13:29

"Right now I feel that Ive got my feet on the ground as far as my head
is concerned."
-- Baseball pitcher Bo Belinsky

figurative commented on 2021-06-21 11:35

Saint: A dead sinner revised and edited.
-- Ambrose Bierce

proctor commented on 2021-06-20 17:53

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition
of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this
belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with
beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there....
It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical
terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite
glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from
metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The
fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that
should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They
have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres
no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested
and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at
all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it
has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable --
you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else.
-- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC
News "Nightline," May 3, 1988