Package Details: leakiness 3.17.11-4

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: leakiness
Description: gotem
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: bushiness, enlarging, pinnies, plainness, professes
Provides: burls, mistassinis, queering, reimbursed, shamanism, tuscaloosas
Replaces: alderman, cornstarchs, metempsychoses
Submitter: overhang
Maintainer: portmanteaus
Last Packager: montaignes
Votes: 16
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-10-16 17:12
Last Updated: 2021-10-16 17:12

Required by (57)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

molina commented on 2021-10-18 20:31

"Israel today announced that it is giving up. The Zionist state will dissolve in two weeks time, and its citizens will disperse to various resort communities around the world. Said Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, Who needs the aggravation?" -- Dennis Miller, "Satuday Night Live" News

sideways commented on 2021-10-18 03:42

"Unlike most net.puritans, however, I feel that what OTHER consenting computers do in the privacy of their own phone connections is their own business." -- John Woods,

cares commented on 2021-10-17 15:29

The last thing one knows in constructing a work is what to put first. -- Blaise Pascal

revolting commented on 2021-10-17 08:11

...Another writer again agreed with all my generalities, but said that as an inveterate skeptic I have closed my mind to the truth. Most notably I have ignored the evidence for an Earth that is six thousand years old. Well, I havent ignored it; I considered the purported evidence and *then* rejected it. There is a difference, and this is a difference, we might say, between prejudice and postjudice. Prejudice is making a judgment before you have looked at the facts. Postjudice is making a judgment afterwards. Prejudice is terrible, in the sense that you commit injustices and you make serious mistakes. Postjudice is not terrible. You cant be perfect of course; you may make mistakes also. But it is permissible to make a judgment after you have examined the evidence. In some circles it is even encouraged. -- Carl Sagan, The Burden of Skepticism, Skeptical Enquirer, Vol. 12, pg. 46