Warning: file_exists(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/srv/http/vhosts/aur.archlinux.org/public/web/locale//en/LC_MESSAGES/aurweb.mo) is not within the allowed path(s): (/srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/:/etc/aurweb/) in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/streams.php on line 90
AUR (en) - intellij-idea-ultimate-edition

Notice: Undefined variable: name in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc.php on line 248

Package Details: intellij-idea-ultimate-edition 2016.3.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition.git (read-only)
Package Base: intellij-idea-ultimate-edition
Description: An intelligent IDE for Java, Groovy and other programming languages with advanced refactoring features intensely focused on developer productivity.
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/
Licenses: Commercial
Submitter: uwolfer
Maintainer: uwolfer (dcelasun)
Last Packager: uwolfer
Votes: 238
Popularity: 10.018263
First Submitted: 2009-10-28 09:09
Last Updated: 2017-02-01 08:00

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

Det commented on 2017-02-02 06:13

Huh. I wonder we really need all these.

E: Agh, I f*cked up the "J" in the title: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2017-February/033180.html

flycal6 commented on 2017-02-02 04:13

Thanks. The bundled jdk fixed it.

I ended up keeping this version of Intellij and installed the AUR package intellij-jdk. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-jdk/

Det commented on 2017-02-01 16:45

Idk if this works with Linux, but on macOS the bundled (Open)JDK gave much better fonts: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ue-bundled-jre/

Might also wanna try to switch between Oracle JDK <-> OpenJDK.

flycal6 commented on 2017-02-01 16:38

Anyone having font issues? My editor looks fine, but the menu and file tree looks terrible, like it's rendering in low res.

kazi commented on 2017-01-17 20:07

IntelliJ IDEA 2016.3.3 was released.
New version: 2016.3.3
New build version: 163.11103.6
New checksum: 557d675d002f85bb55dea880bfdaa2d3794543b6ae2f4a6aecac7a988cb07645

Det commented on 2017-01-07 19:07

I <3 IntelliJ IDEA.

Great package, and uwolfer is probably an awesome man.

Ain't that right? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

njam commented on 2016-12-29 16:41

Here's a way to create a split package: https://github.com/njam/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition/blob/master/PKGBUILD

There is only 1 PKGBUILD file, but it defines 4 packages.
The main package is "intellij-idea-ultimate-edition" and depends on "intellij-idea-ultimate-edition-jre-meta". This JRE meta package is not a real package, but it is provided by two other packages:
- intellij-idea-ultimate-edition-jre-bundled: The JRE bundled with the Jetbrains download.
- intellij-idea-ultimate-edition-jre-system: The default "java-environment" package.

The user will be asked which package he wants to install ("-jre-bundled" or "-jre-system"). Looks very nice I think. Thanks @pschichtel for the help! @uwolfer wdyt?

njam commented on 2016-12-28 09:36

Agree, this "split package" approach seems like a nice solution! Will try to look into it. Need to better understand how "makepkg" works first.

uwolfer commented on 2016-12-27 20:15

@pschichtel: The official IntelliJ community edition package provided by Archlinux does also not provide the bundled JRE.

So there were IMHO three ways to handle this in the future:
1: Provide a 2nd package "intellij-idea-ultimate-edition-bundled-jre", let the existing one as-is.
2: Provide a variable which can be switched easily at buildtime like AUR pkg "intellij-idea-ue-eap" does:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=intellij-idea-ue-eap
3: Do it like Clion, which requires a bit more efforts to maintain for me.

Since I use IntelliJ without bundled JRE on daily basis without issues, I have decided to not invest more efforts than required. Since @njam decided to publish a package with bundled JRE, everybody can decide at installation time which solution he prefers.

Thanks to @njam for standing up and creating this new package.

pschichtel commented on 2016-12-27 19:28

@njam just out of interest: What where the reasons to go for a separate package instead of a split package?