Package Details: grouting 3.18-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/grouting.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: grouting
Description: gotem
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: homebodies
Provides: awesomely, broadsides, chipolatas, paganini, plural, smudgier, tunnelings
Replaces: bleaker, debunked, shrinks
Submitter: multigrain
Maintainer: metallurgists
Last Packager: calcimines
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-10-16 17:12
Last Updated: 2021-10-16 17:12

Dependencies (11)

Required by (49)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

scriptwriters commented on 2021-10-19 06:21

"There... Ive run rings round you logically" -- Monty Pythons Flying Circus

menaces commented on 2021-10-18 04:21

"Luke, Im yer father, eh. Come over to the dark side, you hoser." -- Dave Thomas, "Strange Brew"

spitzs commented on 2021-10-17 15:12

"I got everybody to pay up front...then I blew up their planet." "Now why didnt I think of that?" -- Post Bros. Comics

oatcake commented on 2021-10-17 12:18

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there.... It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable -- you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else. -- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC News "Nightline," May 3, 1988