Warning: file_exists(): open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/srv/http/vhosts/aur.archlinux.org/public/web/locale//en/LC_MESSAGES/aurweb.mo) is not within the allowed path(s): (/srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/:/etc/aurweb/) in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/streams.php on line 90
AUR (en) - findutils-selinux

Notice: Undefined variable: name in /srv/http/vhosts/aur-dev.archlinux.org/public/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc.php on line 248

Package Details: findutils-selinux 4.6.0-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/findutils-selinux.git (read-only)
Package Base: findutils-selinux
Description: GNU utilities to locate files with SELinux support
Upstream URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/findutils
Licenses: GPL3
Groups: selinux
Conflicts: findutils, selinux-findutils
Provides: findutils=4.6.0-2, selinux-findutils=4.6.0-2
Submitter: Siosm
Maintainer: IooNag
Last Packager: IooNag
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.967735
First Submitted: 2013-11-03 20:05
Last Updated: 2016-08-05 20:03

Required by (59)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

IooNag commented on 2016-03-29 22:28

Hello, the script which fails for you is http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=findutils.git;a=blob;f=find/testsuite/sv-34976-execdir-fd-leak.sh;h=c2cd238444f006820a2613e134a85c7524fd7e4f;hb=HEAD . There seems to be an error message associated to the test failure. Could you please find what error message the script gave, for example by reading src/findutils-4.6.0/find/testsuite/sv-34976-execdir-fd-leak.log in the build directory, or by running "srcdir=$(pwd) ./sv-34976-execdir-fd-leak.sh" in src/findutils-4.6.0/find/testsuite/ ?
Moreover, as this does not seem to be related with SELinux, could you build findutils package from the ABS and check whether its tests pass on your system?

x2b commented on 2016-03-29 21:07

I noticed that I can't build the package, notably the check fails:

FAIL: sv-34976-execdir-fd-leak.sh

Any idea why that happens?

Siosm commented on 2014-01-02 21:50

Renamed to findutils-selinux

xangelux commented on 2013-02-17 22:51

you are right, it should be left to decide by the user

Nicky726 commented on 2013-02-11 19:58

As for sources signature, I think it's up to whoever builds it to decide wheather he trusts the developer and his public key. This should not be done on the PKGBUILD level, I think. Or am I mistaken?

xangelux commented on 2013-02-11 05:37

the signature complains about been unreliable, it builds and installs, but just to tune it it would be nice to have it pass

Nicky726 commented on 2010-07-21 12:41

Initial release.

Enables you to find files acording to security context.