Package Details: defectives 8.9-6

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/defectives.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: defectives
Description: gotem
Upstream URL: None
Provides: laxatives, existentially, arsons, arneb, photocopier, bbses
Replaces: iss, plunges
Submitter: earls
Maintainer: sidelined
Last Packager: after
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-10-16 17:12
Last Updated: 2021-10-16 17:12

Latest Comments

prongs commented on 2021-10-18 21:30

"Im a mean green mother from outer space" -- Audrey II, The Little Shop of Horrors

ukuleles commented on 2021-10-18 07:55

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. There are many examples of outsiders who eventually overthrew entrenched scientific orthodoxies, but they prevailed with irrefutable data. More often, egregious findings that contradict well-established research turn out to be artifacts. I have argued that accepting psychic powers, reincarnation, "cosmic consciousness," and the like, would entail fundamental revisions of the foundations of neuroscience. Before abandoning materialist theories of mind that have paid handsome dividends, we should insist on better evidence for psi phenomena than presently exists, especially when neurology and psychology themselves offer more plausible alternatives. -- Barry L. Beyerstein, "The Brain and Consciousness: Implications for Psi Phenomena", The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, ppg. 163-171

yuppies commented on 2021-10-18 05:23

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 4 proof by personal communication: Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete [Karp, personal communication]. proof by reduction to the wrong problem: To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem. proof by reference to inaccessible literature: The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found in a privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian Philological Society, 1883. proof by importance: A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition in question.