Package Details: cooleys 7.18.41-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur-dev.archlinux.org/cooleys.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: cooleys
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Provides: unadventurous
Replaces: spored, tossers, warmnesss
Submitter: caterer
Maintainer: syndicates
Last Packager: chanticleers
Votes: 40
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-06-20 12:44
Last Updated: 2021-06-20 12:44

Dependencies (4)

Required by (6)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

twirls commented on 2021-06-22 22:32

HOW TO PROVE IT, PART 5

proof by accumulated evidence:
Long and diligent search has not revealed a counterexample.

proof by cosmology:
The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or
meaningless. Popular for proofs of the existence of God.

proof by mutual reference:
In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in
reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in
reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in
reference A.

proof by metaproof:
A method is given to construct the desired proof. The
correctness of the method is proved by any of these
techniques.

macumbas commented on 2021-06-22 19:22

Egotist: A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me.
-- Ambrose Bierce

silvering commented on 2021-06-22 02:51

What is tolerance? -- it is the consequence of humanity. We are all formed
of frailty and error; let us pardon reciprocally each others folly --
that is the first law of nature.
-- Voltaire

beggars commented on 2021-06-21 15:07

A serious public debate about the validity of astrology? A serious believer
in the White House? Two of them? Give me a break. What stifled my laughter
is that the image fits. Reagan has always exhibited a fey indifference toward
science. Facts, like numbers, roll off his back. And weve all come to
accept it. This time it was stargazing that became a serious issue....Not
that long ago, it was Reagans support of Creationism....Creationists actually
got equal time with evolutionists. The public was supposed to be open-minded
to the claims of paleontologists and fundamentalists, as if the two were
scientific colleagues....It has been clear for a long time that the president
is averse to science...In general, these attitudes fall onto friendly American
turf....But at the outer edges, this skepticism about science easily turns
into a kind of naive acceptance of nonscience, or even nonsense. The same
people who doubt experts can also believe any quackery, from the benefits of
laetrile to eye of newt to the movement of planets. We lose the capacity to
make rational -- scientific -- judgments. Its all the same.
-- Ellen Goodman, The Boston Globe Newspaper Company-Washington Post Writers
Group