Package Details: community 3.15-4

Git Clone URL: https://localhost:8443/community.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: community
Description: None
Upstream URL: None
Conflicts: lurk, mandelbrot, mauras, miserliness
Provides: broodiness, cauliflowers, cubit, scorches, sutler, theyd, vapory
Replaces: servomotor, terrifies
Submitter: poaching
Maintainer: zits
Last Packager: musty
Votes: 22
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2021-10-16 17:12
Last Updated: 2021-10-16 17:12

Required by (45)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

cardiopulmonary commented on 2021-10-19 13:29

...difference of opinion is advantageous in religion. The several sects
perform the office of a common censor morum over each other. Is uniformity
attainable? Millions of innocent men, women, and children, since the
introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned;
yet we have not advanced one inch towards uniformity.
-- Thomas Jefferson, "Notes on Virginia"

atari commented on 2021-10-18 14:15

"The chain which can be yanked is not the eternal chain."
-- G. Fitch

cambium commented on 2021-10-17 15:29

[Astrology is] 100 percent hokum, Ted. As a matter of fact, the first edition
of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, written in 1771 -- 1771! -- said that this
belief system is a subject long ago ridiculed and reviled. Were dealing with
beliefs that go back to the ancient Babylonians. Theres nothing there....
It sounds a lot like science, it sounds like astronomy. Its got technical
terms. Its got jargon. It confuses the public....The astrologer is quite
glib, confuses the public, uses terms which come from science, come from
metaphysics, come from a host of fields, but they really mean nothing. The
fact is that astrological beliefs go back at least 2,500 years. Now that
should be a sufficiently long time for astrologers to prove their case. They
have not proved their case....Its just simply gibberish. The fact is, theres
no theory for it, there are no observational data for it. Its been tested
and tested over the centuries. Nobodys ever found any validity to it at
all. It is not even close to a science. A science has to be repeatable, it
has to have a logical foundation, and it has to be potentially vulnerable --
you test it. And in that astrology is really quite something else.
-- Astronomer Richard Berendzen, President, American University, on ABC
News "Nightline," May 3, 1988

nehemiahs commented on 2021-10-17 01:33

Delta: A real man lands where he wants to. -- David Letterman